<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The sterilization of dirty talk</title>
	<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/</link>
	<description>Through avatar Cheri Horton, journalist Noche Kandora explores Second Life, with a focus on avatar relationships, sim sex and its culture.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Noche</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-326</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-326</guid>
					<description>Hi zaq. I've been so busy, I haven't had a chance to respond. I am curious to know what sort of thing you have in mind when you refer to the &quot;something more&quot; that needs to be added to enhance arousal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi zaq. I&#8217;ve been so busy, I haven&#8217;t had a chance to respond. I am curious to know what sort of thing you have in mind when you refer to the &#8220;something more&#8221; that needs to be added to enhance arousal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: zaq curry</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-297</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-297</guid>
					<description>exactly!!

the 3D nature of SecondLife is a great backdrop, but it fails to excite the sexual imagination, just like a naked person is merely naked, there needs to be something &quot;more&quot; to the interchange for it to be exciting and thrilling.

I agree; people are either a)inhibited or b)uncreative</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>exactly!!</p>
	<p>the 3D nature of SecondLife is a great backdrop, but it fails to excite the sexual imagination, just like a naked person is merely naked, there needs to be something &#8220;more&#8221; to the interchange for it to be exciting and thrilling.</p>
	<p>I agree; people are either a)inhibited or b)uncreative
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cinomed Tweak</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-168</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-168</guid>
					<description>*makes mental note*
Who knows... we may end up finally meeting....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>*makes mental note*<br />
Who knows&#8230; we may end up finally meeting&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Noche</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-161</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 06:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-161</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Are you more interested in nasty talk than any emotes?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Heck, yes. It just adds so much more intimacy and excitement. But it's got to be sincere. Otherwise, may as well just use the emotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong><em>Are you more interested in nasty talk than any emotes?</em></strong></p>
	<p>Heck, yes. It just adds so much more intimacy and excitement. But it&#8217;s got to be sincere. Otherwise, may as well just use the emotes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cinomed Tweak</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-159</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-159</guid>
					<description>So let me ask,
Are you more interested in nasty talk than any emotes?
Or would you like them both?
The varying methods of cyber in SL astound me sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So let me ask,<br />
Are you more interested in nasty talk than any emotes?<br />
Or would you like them both?<br />
The varying methods of cyber in SL astound me sometimes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cinomed Tweak</title>
		<link>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-147</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://apogeevr.com/2006/04/24/the-sterilization-of-dirty-talk/#comment-147</guid>
					<description>*giggle* oh my...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>*giggle* oh my&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
